A full satisfaction concerning a double Romish iniquitie; hainous rebellion, and more then heathenish æquiuocation. Containing three parts: the two former belong to the reply vpon the Moderate Answerer; the first for confirmation of the discouerie in these two points, treason and æquiuocation: the second is a iustification of Protestants, touching the same points. The third part is a large discourse confuting the reasons and grounds of other priests, both in the case of rebellion, and æquiuocation. Published by authoritie.

All titles

• A full satisfaction concerning a double Romish iniquitie; hainous rebellion, and more then heathenish æquiuocation. Containing three parts: the two former belong to the reply vpon the Moderate Answerer; the first for confirmation of the discouerie in these two points, treason and æquiuocation: the second is a iustification of Protestants, touching the same points. The third part is a large discourse confuting the reasons and grounds of other priests, both in the case of rebellion, and æquiuocation. Published by authoritie.
• Third part, which is a confutation of the principles of Romish doctrine, in two points Fvll satisfaction concerning a dovble Romish iniqvitie; hainous rebellion, and more then heathenish æquiuocation

People / Organizations

• Edmond Weauer ("printed for")
• Thomas Morton (Author)

Imprint

London: Printed by Richard Field for Edmond Weauer, 1606.

Publication year

1606-1606

ESTC No.

S112912

Grub Street ID

132657

Description

[12], 121 [i.e. 131], [1]; 103, [1] p. ; 4⁰

Note

Dedication signed: Thomas Morton.

A reply to: Broughton, Richard. A just and moderate answer to a most injurious, and slaunderous pamphlet, intituled, An exact discovery of Romish doctrine in case of conspiracie and rebellion.

Pages 130 and 131 misnumbered 128 and 121.

"The third part, which is a confutation of the principles of Romish doctrine, in two points" (caption title) has separate pagination and register.

Uncontrolled note

Signatures from DFo. DFONOTE jre: in DFo copy 2, misnumbered pp. 130 and 131 have been corrected (pag: [12], 131, [1];...)