An ansvver to the order of the Middlesex justices, dated the 20th. of December last, touching the suppressing of conventicles. Which order is here compared with the act of the 22d of this King, on which the same is grounded. Wherein it will appear that the said order is lame and insufficient for any constable, or other officers to act by. Being an answer to a letter received from a friend in Middlesex, wherein is also laid down some directions to the officers touching the execution of that act, according to the true intent and meaning of that law. By D.R.

All titles

• An ansvver to the order of the Middlesex justices, dated the 20th. of December last, touching the suppressing of conventicles. Which order is here compared with the act of the 22d of this King, on which the same is grounded. Wherein it will appear that the said order is lame and insufficient for any constable, or other officers to act by. Being an answer to a letter received from a friend in Middlesex, wherein is also laid down some directions to the officers touching the execution of that act, according to the true intent and meaning of that law. By D.R.
• Answer to the order of the Middlesex justices, dated the 20th. of December last, touching the suppressing of conventicles

People / Organizations

• Edward Whitaker (Author)

Imprint

[London: printed for Ab. Green, 1682]

Publication year

1682-1682

ESTC No.

R8053

Grub Street ID

128261

Description

11, [1] p. ; 4⁰

Note

D.R. = Edward Whitaker.

Caption title.

Imprint from colophon.

Signatures: A? B?.

Uncontrolled note

Signatures from DFo