A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England: against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator. The first part. In which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated; the distinction of old and new popery historically asserted; and the doctrine of the Church of Rome in point of image-worship more particularly consider'd.
- All titles
-
- A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England: against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator. The first part. In which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated; the distinction of old and new popery historically asserted; and the doctrine of the Church of Rome in point of image-worship more particularly consider'd.
- Second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England. Part 1
- Second defence against the Bishop of Condom
- People / Organizations
-
- Imprint
-
London: printed for Richard Chiswell, at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul's Church-Yard, MDCLXXXVII. [1687]
- Publication year
- 1687-1687
- ESTC No.
- R4642
- Grub Street ID
- 124994
- Description
- [20], xxii, 100, [2] p. ; 4⁰
- Note
- Anonymous. By William Wake.
A reply to "An exposition of the doctrine of the Catholic Church in matters of controversie" by Jacques Bénigne Bossuet, and "A vindication of the Bishop of Condom's exposition of the doctrine of the Catholic Church" by Joseph Johnston.
First leaf bears half-title, "A second defence against the Bishop of Condom.", on recto and imprimatur, "Imprimatur, ... H. Maurice, Reverendissimo in Christo P.D. Wilhelmo Archiepiscopo Cant. à Sacris. Novemb. 16. 1687.", on verso.
With press-figure * on leaves P4r and Q3v, respectively.