An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it. In opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. By Samuel Johnson.
- All titles
-
- An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it. In opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. By Samuel Johnson.
- Argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne
- People / Organizations
-
- Imprint
-
London: printed for the author, 1692.
- Publication year
- 1692-1692
- ESTC No.
- R226875
- Grub Street ID
- 99797
- Description
- 62, [2] p. ; 4⁰
- Note
- With final advertisement leaf.
A variant has pagination: 56, 47-52, [2] p.Citation/references Wing (CD-Rom, 1996), J821Person as subject James II, 1633-1701 -- Early works to 1800.
William III, 1650-1702 -- Early works to 1800. Subject Great Britain -- History -- James II, 1685-1688 -- Pamphlets -- Early works to 1800.
Great Britain -- History -- William and Mary, 1689-1702 -- Pamphlets -- Early works to 1800.