An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it. In opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. By Samuel Johnson.
- All titles
-
- An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it. In opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. By Samuel Johnson.
- Argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne
- People / Organizations
-
- Imprint
-
London: printed for the author, 1692.
- Publication year
- 1692-1692
- ESTC No.
- R2049
- Grub Street ID
- 81762
- Description
- 56, 47-52, [2] p. ; 4⁰
- Note
- With final advertisement leaf.
In this edition, the imprint is printed on 1 line. Another edition is printed on 2 lines. Not distinguished in Wing.
A variant has pagination: 62, [2] p.Citation/references Wing (CD-Rom, 1996), J821