Anti Baal-Berith: or The binding of the Covenant and all Covenanters to their good behaviours. By a just vindication of Dr. Gaudens Analysis (that is, his resolving of the Covenant to law and justice, to duty and conscience, to reason and religion: or his dissolving it) against the cacotomy of a nameless and shameless libeller the worthy hyperaspites of Dr. Burges. Also against the pittyful cavils and objections of Mr. Zach. Grafton [sic], a rigid presbyter. With an answer to that monstrous paradox, of no sacriledge no sin, to alienate Church lands, without and against all laws of God and man. Written by the author of the Analysis
- All titles
-
- Anti Baal-Berith: or The binding of the Covenant and all Covenanters to their good behaviours. By a just vindication of Dr. Gaudens Analysis (that is, his resolving of the Covenant to law and justice, to duty and conscience, to reason and religion: or his dissolving it) against the cacotomy of a nameless and shameless libeller the worthy hyperaspites of Dr. Burges. Also against the pittyful cavils and objections of Mr. Zach. Grafton [sic], a rigid presbyter. With an answer to that monstrous paradox, of no sacriledge no sin, to alienate Church lands, without and against all laws of God and man. Written by the author of the Analysis
- Anti Baal-Berith; Binding of the Covenant and all Covenanters to their good behaviours; Binding of all Covenants and Covenanters to their good behaviour
- People / Organizations
-
- Imprint
-
London : printed by John Best, for Andrew Crook at the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church-yard, 1661.
- Publication year
- 1661
- ESTC No.
- R202101
- Grub Street ID
- 79367
- Description
- [16], 452 [i.e. 152], 177-295, [1] p. ; 4°.
- Note
- The author of the Analysis = John Gauden
A reply to "Anal=epsis" by Zachary Crofton (Wing C6984), and to one or two other, unidentified works
With a title-page engraving
Running title reads: The binding of all Covenants and Covenanters to their good behaviour
P. 152 misnumbered 452
Annotation on Thomason copy: "march 1st", "1660"; 61 in imprint date crossed out.
- Uncontrolled note
- Pagination and register both skip, but text continuous; probably shared printing